Re: Efficiency of SMPS design.
From: Denis Gleeson (dgleeson-2_at_utvinternet.com)
Date: 06/10/04
- Next message: Terry Pinnell: "Re: Switching on giant electromagnet"
- Previous message: Terry Pinnell: "Re: [OT] Stars versus sand grains"
- In reply to: Joerg: "Re: Efficiency of SMPS design."
- Next in thread: John Popelish: "Re: Efficiency of SMPS design."
- Reply: John Popelish: "Re: Efficiency of SMPS design."
- Reply: R.Legg: "Re: Efficiency of SMPS design."
- Reply: Tam/WB2TT: "Re: Efficiency of SMPS design."
- Reply: Joerg: "Re: Efficiency of SMPS design."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 10 Jun 2004 02:11:38 -0700
Hi Guys
Thanks for the help.
Joerg can you recommend a fast fet for this cct. The data *** doesnt
propose one so I kept to a transistor.
Do you have a number for Fred Embuscado?
Ok My diode choice is wrong. Im not sure that a 1N4148b is the
solution. Its not a schotky and I dont think it could source the
current required into the coil. Ill find a suitable schotky.
Time for a new Transistor and diode.
The inductor size is confusing me.
I worked out the value as per the application note
http://www.national.com/an/AN/AN-1066.pdf
Ill need to look at the inductor selection some more
thanks.
Bye for now.
Denis
Joerg <notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote in message news:<MnKxc.68785$v16.67479@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com>...
> Hi Denis,
>
> That regulator worked like a champ for me. Three thoughts:
>
> A 2N2905 may not be the ticket here. You need a fast FET.
>
> Also, these fast reg chips cannot easily be breadboarded. It must be an
> RF circuit type of build, whether that is a prototype or a PCB. No long
> traces or wires.
>
> National has a great forum on their site for dessigners of switchers.
> They are very responsive and you don't even need password, sign-up or
> anything. Select "Power", then "Discussion Forum". Or call and ask for
> Fred Embuscado. I wish that all companies were as customer oriented as
> National is. Big cheers to them.
>
> Regards, Joerg
>
> http://www.analogconsultants.com
- Next message: Terry Pinnell: "Re: Switching on giant electromagnet"
- Previous message: Terry Pinnell: "Re: [OT] Stars versus sand grains"
- In reply to: Joerg: "Re: Efficiency of SMPS design."
- Next in thread: John Popelish: "Re: Efficiency of SMPS design."
- Reply: John Popelish: "Re: Efficiency of SMPS design."
- Reply: R.Legg: "Re: Efficiency of SMPS design."
- Reply: Tam/WB2TT: "Re: Efficiency of SMPS design."
- Reply: Joerg: "Re: Efficiency of SMPS design."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]