Re: 1000 year power source for design?
From: Rene Tschaggelar (none_at_none.net)
Date: 06/12/04
- Next message: Klaus Bahner: "Re: dacs, microcontrollers and ground planes"
- Previous message: Roger Gt: "Re: MOSFET failure rates to MIL-HDBK-217F"
- In reply to: ddwyer: "Re: 1000 year power source for design?"
- Next in thread: ddwyer: "Re: 1000 year power source for design?"
- Reply: ddwyer: "Re: 1000 year power source for design?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 21:50:35 +0200
ddwyer wrote:
> In article <lR1xc.15872$QI2.8265@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>, Hank
> <nospam@nospam.com> writes
>
>>So...say I want to design a small sealed device, maybe dry nitrogen filled, that
>>will play back a message after remaining dormant for 500 to 1000 years.
>
> Im intrigued by the thought that the newer the recording technology the
> shorter the life before excessive deterioration.
> Compare a cuneiform tablet and a recordable DVD which is alleged to have
> a lifetime of a few years..
> The fired ceramic is ok after 5000 years and I cant see any reason why
> 1000000 years should pose a problem.
the content of the fired ceramic is a bit lower than on a DVD though.
Rene
-- Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com & commercial newsgroups - http://www.talkto.net
- Next message: Klaus Bahner: "Re: dacs, microcontrollers and ground planes"
- Previous message: Roger Gt: "Re: MOSFET failure rates to MIL-HDBK-217F"
- In reply to: ddwyer: "Re: 1000 year power source for design?"
- Next in thread: ddwyer: "Re: 1000 year power source for design?"
- Reply: ddwyer: "Re: 1000 year power source for design?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|