Re: A brief Survey for Electrical Engineers
From: Philip A. Marshall (philmarshall_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/15/04
- Next message: John Larkin: "Re: Schedule 40 pipe ok for coil forms?"
- Previous message: Roger Gt: "Re: [OT:] Re: War on humanity"
- In reply to: K Williams: "Re: A brief Survey for Electrical Engineers"
- Next in thread: Rich Grise: "Re: A brief Survey for Electrical Engineers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 03:56:02 GMT
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:39:10 -0700, K Williams <krw@att.biz> wrote:
>I think your original post was quite clear, but do understand that
>people are reluctant to respond to such requests. For the record,
>I found your posts to be up-front enough that I responded with more
>information that I normally would have even thought of giving. I
>certainly hope I've judged you correctly (and you do indeed trim
>information you've promised before re-posting), but so far I think
>I have.
I realize not everyone is willing to give the information I'm looking
for. As a result, I think that the onus is on me to adequately
explain my full intentions and background.
In addition, I've left people the option of remaining fully anonymous
in terms of both their names and the names of the companies they've
worked for.
Thank you to all who respond, but I also respect if you chose not to
for whatever reason.
-Philip A. Marshall
- Next message: John Larkin: "Re: Schedule 40 pipe ok for coil forms?"
- Previous message: Roger Gt: "Re: [OT:] Re: War on humanity"
- In reply to: K Williams: "Re: A brief Survey for Electrical Engineers"
- Next in thread: Rich Grise: "Re: A brief Survey for Electrical Engineers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|