Re: Hysteresis needed in 741 Op-Amp circuit

From: John Fields (jfields_at_austininstruments.com)
Date: 06/16/04


Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 07:52:20 -0500

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:31:35 -0300, YD <yd.techHAT@techie.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 06:46:59 GMT, Robert Baer
><robertbaer@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>John Fields wrote:
>>>
>>------------- SNIPped ------------
>>... a *VERY* long-winded paper that might be called a thesis (or
>>mini-novel?).
>> If you had a ?questiion? concerning hysteresis, it would have been
>>nice to make a *BRIEF* synopsis of the problem.
>> Else, do not waste bandwidth!
>
>I liked it. A good exposition on how to tackle the problem. I put a
>copy in the saved folder for future referral. Only one thing, where
>does the 741 come into it?

---
What's a 741?^)
-- 
John Fields


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Hysteresis needed in 741 Op-Amp circuit
    ... >> If you had a ?questiion? ... concerning hysteresis, it would have been ... >> Else, do not waste bandwidth! ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Hysteresis needed in 741 Op-Amp circuit
    ... > If you had a ?questiion? ... concerning hysteresis, it would have been ... > Else, do not waste bandwidth! ... Hah! ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Hysteresis needed in 741 Op-Amp circuit
    ... On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 06:46:59 GMT, Robert Baer ... > If you had a ?questiion? ... concerning hysteresis, it would have been ... Sometimes I even put it in the food. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Hysteresis needed in 741 Op-Amp circuit
    ... On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 06:46:59 GMT, Robert Baer ... > If you had a ?questiion? ... concerning hysteresis, it would have been ... Remove HAT if replying by mail. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Hysteresis needed in 741 Op-Amp circuit
    ... concerning hysteresis, it would have been ... >> Else, do not waste bandwidth! ... Perhaps Robert Baer missed the thread in s.e.basics that prompted John ...
    (sci.electronics.design)