Re: US digital terrestial TV a disaster?
From: ddwyer (dd_at_ddwyer.demon.co.uk)
Date: 06/25/04
- Next message: Joerg: "Re: Wire wrap"
- Previous message: John Fields: "Re: Wire wrap"
- In reply to: PaulCsouls: "Re: US digital terrestial TV a disaster?"
- Next in thread: YD: "Re: US digital terrestial TV a disaster?"
- Reply: YD: "Re: US digital terrestial TV a disaster?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:51:11 +0100
In article <tq7nd05gs19vi2mc65kh52n7ukthr5usqd@4ax.com>, PaulCsouls
<paulcsouls@worldnet.att.net> writes
>Sounds about right. The major movie studios, wireless service
>providers, and the cable and satellite companies are all the same
>companies.
In the UK we are catching up with the US as per the number of channels
available.
Assuming that there is a fairly fixed revenue for programming the money
available for the program material is 1/the number of channels. So our
program quality is deteriorating to US levels.
High definition rubbish is still rubbish.
-- ddwyer
- Next message: Joerg: "Re: Wire wrap"
- Previous message: John Fields: "Re: Wire wrap"
- In reply to: PaulCsouls: "Re: US digital terrestial TV a disaster?"
- Next in thread: YD: "Re: US digital terrestial TV a disaster?"
- Reply: YD: "Re: US digital terrestial TV a disaster?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
