Re: OT: The U.S. has a King

From: Fred Bloggs (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 06/27/04 

Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:42:33 GMT

Terry Given wrote:
> "Fred Bloggs" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:40DC25FE.3030102@nospam.com...
>
>>
>>Kevin Aylward wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Personal insults are *always* a sign that the insulter has zero
>>>arguments, and should therefore be completely ignored.
>>
>>It is impossible to describe someone like you without insult. You are an
>>arrogant, semi-educated piece of trash- how else can this be said. You
>>have indulged in "sex, drugs, and something or another" to the exclusion
>>of any other productive purpose, and then shoot-off your damned limey
>>sh_t mouth in criticism of a system about which you are hopelessly
>>incapable of understanding.
>>
>
>
> delightful, albeit inaccurate. I would have thought Kevins response was
> typed....although I suppose he might have a speech-to-text converter...
>
> Cheers
> Terry
>

Well he started a thread implying the President is overstepping the
bounds of his Constitutional authority, and I cited the controlling
primary authority in U.S. Reports for both that and the "unlawful
combatant" ruling- then he arrogantly snips that, tells me I missed the
point, goes into some desultory fog about someone stealing a handbag,
and other moronic crap- accuses me of having no argument etc. He is a
total aggravating retard. He probably thinks U.S. Reports is just
documentation for a future TV documentary or something quite common-
does not realize that the Supreme Court itself uses it for case law
research- has no concept of the role of courts in government or the
empowerment of the judiciary to make law under the English common law
system- just too much ignorance for me to tolerate- As I said before- he
is pure trash- if for no other reason than he lacks the humility to know
when he is a clueless vagrant who should just shut the hell up.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: The U.S. has a King
    ... >Terry Given wrote: ... >documentation for a future TV documentary or something quite common- ... >does not realize that the Supreme Court itself uses it for case law ... >empowerment of the judiciary to make law under the English common law ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Big Brother Want to Sniff *Your* Breath.
    ... Because of the important interest in protecting the safety of police ... This is allowed if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a crime ... The scope of Terry was extended in the 2004 Supreme Court case Hiibel ...
    (rec.arts.sf.fandom)
  • Re: It has been fun and all but:
    ... > When and if this silly law is struck down, ... According to the courts, ... In addition, you indicate you're Terry from Lexington, ... Once this law is challenged in the courts, it will be struck ...
    (rec.autos.makers.honda)
  • Re: Off-Topic -- Gender Discrimination
    ... "Discrimination based on race is expressly ... prohibited in federal civil rights law. ... discrimination based on sex is not expressly prohibited by ... Note how Terry wants to shift goalposts away from the idiotic ...
    (rec.games.frp.dnd)
  • Re: PSNI still targetting solicitors
    ... Terry wrote: ... When the PSNI aren't out murdering solicitors, ... It was the police who were acting above the law here. ... That would be the Solicitor-Client Privilege Act of - I don't know - when ...
    (soc.culture.irish)
Quantcast