Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?

From: Leon Heller (leon_heller_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/08/04


Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 21:54:18 +0100


"Talal Itani" <titani@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:cckb50$cl9@library2.airnews.net...
> Hello,
>
> I currently have an ICD2 from Microchip. I use it to develop PIC16 code
> using the MPLAB debugger and assembler. I need to move to the PIC18 parts
> and C language, but I am struggling figure out the development tools to
get.
> Do you have any experience with the CCS compiler running with MPLAB and
> ICD2? ($175 solution)

Where I used to work we used the Hi-Tech compiler for the PIC18, and had
relatively few problems. The Microchip compiler was unusable. They have
probably improved it.

Leon

-- 
Leon Heller, G1HSM
http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
    ... > using the MPLAB debugger and assembler. ... Where I used to work we used the Hi-Tech compiler for the PIC18, ... Leon Heller, G1HSM ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
    ... > using the MPLAB debugger and assembler. ... If you're going for C on the PIC18, ... solution is the IAR compiler. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
    ... > using the MPLAB debugger and assembler. ... If you're going for C on the PIC18, ... solution is the IAR compiler. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
    ... > using the MPLAB debugger and assembler. ... PIC18F8720) using the CCS pic18 compiler. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Which PIC18 C Compiler?
    ... >>using the MPLAB debugger and assembler. ... I need to move to the PIC18 parts ... > solution is the IAR compiler. ... IAR is the one and only choice. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)