Re: "Normal" crystal amplitude
From: Rich Grise (null_at_example.net)
Date: 07/20/04
- Next message: Rene Tschaggelar: "Re: High current power supply?"
- Previous message: The Real Andy: "Re: Sydney-X1 FPGA Computer Challenges Commodore, Amiga and Apple"
- In reply to: Tim Wescott: "Re: "Normal" crystal amplitude"
- Next in thread: colin: "Re: "Normal" crystal amplitude"
- Reply: colin: "Re: "Normal" crystal amplitude"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:55:40 GMT
Tim Wescott wrote:
> colin wrote:
>
>> its all a trade off, you need a certain amount of drive in order for it
>> to start up properly etc, but too much drive and it will eventualy damage
...
>> "Richard" <rh86@no.spam> wrote in message
>> news:40FB7338.3FBA565E@no.spam...
>>
>>>Should the sine wave from a crystal normally swing the full range from 0
>>>to Vcc? (i.e., 3.3V p-p for a 3.3V supply)
> When I want to get an idea of the amplitudes in an oscillator I'll make
> a 11:1 capacitive divider (C in series with 10C) for the scope probe.
> This keeps the scope from messing up the amplitudes in the circuit (or
> stopping the oscillator altogether).
>
> I don't know if it's the _right_ way, but it works well for me.
>
It's probably pretty close, since that's the way 10X scope probes
work. :-)
-- Cheers! Rich
- Next message: Rene Tschaggelar: "Re: High current power supply?"
- Previous message: The Real Andy: "Re: Sydney-X1 FPGA Computer Challenges Commodore, Amiga and Apple"
- In reply to: Tim Wescott: "Re: "Normal" crystal amplitude"
- Next in thread: colin: "Re: "Normal" crystal amplitude"
- Reply: colin: "Re: "Normal" crystal amplitude"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]