Re: Current transformer compensation idea
From: Jim Thompson (thegreatone_at_example.com)
Date: 07/27/04
- Next message: DesignElect: "Re: Unknown device"
- Previous message: ddwyer: "Scanner technology"
- In reply to: analog: "Current transformer compensation idea"
- Next in thread: Yzordderex: "Re: Current transformer compensation idea"
- Reply: Yzordderex: "Re: Current transformer compensation idea"
- Reply: Robert Baer: "Re: Current transformer compensation idea"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:44:06 -0700
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:25:49 GMT, analog <analog@ieee.org> wrote:
>A typical current transformer may have a one turn primary and
>a hundred or more secondary turns. The secondary is normally
>terminated into a small resistor (possibly through diodes)
>such that the core must support a small ac flux excursion.
>With secondary signals in the volt range, the primary voltage
>burden is minimal, usually a few millivolts.
>
>Although dc drift may be a problem for some configurations,
>a typical current transformer rarely comes anywhere close to
>saturation during normal operation. In spite of this,
>inductive signal droop may be a problem in high fidelity
>applications (magnetizing current is typically very non
>linear).
>
>I have been toying with the idea of using active circuitry to
>minimize magnetizing current. My first idea was to arrange
>the current transformer to drive the summing junction of an
>opamp rather than terminating it into a small resistor. This
>would tend to keep the voltage across the CT's secondary at
>zero, which would be a noticeable improvement over the
>standard arrangement.
>
>However, this would still leave the voltage burden from the
>sense current flowing through the CT's winding resistance.
>Even this could be largely nulled out by actively driving the
>"grounded" end of the current transformer with a feed forward
>signal proportional to current appropriately scaled just to
>equal the drop developed on the internal winding resistance.
>
>Okay, I have never built this circuit and don't have a real
>application for it, but the simulator says all works great.
>What I am wondering is whether anyone has used or seen such
>a technique before or could imagine a situation where such a
>circuit might prove useful. Note that this technique does not
>eliminate the dc saturation problem (although it does make the
>CT's core "look" much bigger). Comments or further ideas?
>
>analog
I haven't done any active feedback to reduce the "voltage burden" of
the CT's winding resistance, but what I have done is use a DC loop
back to the "grounded" end of the CT to eliminate the terrible offset
that results from a direct connection to an OpAmp summing node.
(I used a DC-restorer to get the peak current value relative to
ground... current-limiting application.)
...Jim Thompson
-- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
- Next message: DesignElect: "Re: Unknown device"
- Previous message: ddwyer: "Scanner technology"
- In reply to: analog: "Current transformer compensation idea"
- Next in thread: Yzordderex: "Re: Current transformer compensation idea"
- Reply: Yzordderex: "Re: Current transformer compensation idea"
- Reply: Robert Baer: "Re: Current transformer compensation idea"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|