Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart

From: Paul Burridge (pb_at_notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk)
Date: 07/31/04 

Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:55:03 +0100

On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:21:21 -0400, Activ8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net>
wrote:

>Bull***. it's magnitude and angle. You plot Z = R + jX on the
>friggin chart and measure the distance from the origin to get
>magnitude. You measure the angle to get.. angle. Imagine that.
>
>If you do mag = sqrt(R^2 + X^2) and angle = atan(X/R) and plot it,
>you'll see that no conversion was necessary at all.

I *have* done the maths and plotted it. That's the whole point of the
original question. I can only assume you didn't understand the
original point or else you're incapable of expressing yourself
clearly. If you don't have anything useful to contribute to the
threads I start then I'd be grateful if you just kept your views to
yourself. There was a time when I valued your input but it seems those
days are over.
'Bye, Mike. 

-- 
"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
Quantcast