Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart
From: Activ8 (reply2group_at_ndbbm.net)
Date: 07/31/04
- Next message: Activ8: "Re: Most Outstanding Contributor Award 2004"
- Previous message: John Larkin: "Re: TI Rocks!"
- In reply to: Paul Burridge: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Next in thread: W3JDR: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Reply: W3JDR: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Reply: Paul Burridge: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:30:38 -0400
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 15:33:29 +0100, Paul Burridge wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 09:13:05 -0400, Activ8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net>
> wrote:
>
> [yet more unnecessary verbiage snipped]
Ok. from now on I'll just say you're out to lunch without bothering
to point out where or why.
>
> So you could have saved a lot of bandwidth and me a lot of valuable
> time
That's the pot calling the kettle black. Aside from the need for
others to repeatedly spell things out for you, you're also the guy
who braged about the record setting flame war you had with some
dude. I don't suppose yuo consider that a waste of bandwidth. Don't
add hypocrisy to your transgressionsl.
> by just simply stating "no it's not possible to perform a summary
> translation between S and Y parameters by mappings on the Smith Chart"
But for the third time, it is. The eqs are for getting a *numerical*
answer. If you have the chart, you just read the conversion off of
it directly. Start with the example on pg 105.
That's three (or so) times I've told you and yet you can't
understand why people tire of your lack of understanding.
> and we could all have got on with our lives.
Didn't know you had one ;) ... couldn't resist.
> Thanks for unnecessarily
> dragging out the discussion yet adding nothing to it
Ok. You're right. I added nothing. It was all bs. You *can't* do it
on the SC and you *must* use the conversion formulas. Happy now?
Bowick and I are both wrong.
> - oh and the
> gratuitous insults as well, of course.
>>>>Then maybe I should charge you for my input.
>>>
>>> Fine. I'll send you a capacitor for the purpose. 1pF ought to cover
>>> it.
>>
>>Well, at least you'll have attached *some* value to it.
>
> No. You misunderstand again. The charge (electrical charge geddit?)
But you said we can't discuss electronics in this forum.
> is
> for *you* to put into it. The bill for my wasted time is in the mail.
If you want to avoid wasting time, take up wood working.
-- Best Regards, Mike
- Next message: Activ8: "Re: Most Outstanding Contributor Award 2004"
- Previous message: John Larkin: "Re: TI Rocks!"
- In reply to: Paul Burridge: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Next in thread: W3JDR: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Reply: W3JDR: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Reply: Paul Burridge: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|