Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart

From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 07/31/04 

Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 19:28:48 +0100

I read in sci.electronics.design that Activ8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net>
wrote (in <1hv1lz9ljgo3f$.dlg@news.individual.net>) about 'S - Y
Parameter conversion with Smith Chart', on Sat, 31 Jul 2004:
>On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 18:07:49 +0100, John Woodgate wrote:
>
>> I read in sci.electronics.design that Activ8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net>
>> wrote (in <uo5xsdawvz9f.dlg@news.individual.net>) about 'S - Y Parameter
>> conversion with Smith Chart', on Sat, 31 Jul 2004:
>>
>>>I can see it's not an s-param
>>
>> I was asking HOW you can see that. Do you have selective spectacles,
>> tuned to s-parameter expressions?
>
>Just because s-params are in mag <ang format and not in a + jb . At
>least I've never seen tham that way.

I asked purely for information. It might have been that there are limits
on the values that the various parameters can take, and that example was
outside the limits for an s-parameter.

>Furthermore, I know exactly what PB
>is referring to, in case you didn't notice the page number refs.

I noticed that, but I, and doubtless many others, don't have the book. 

-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. 
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

Relevant Pages

  • Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart
    ... I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin <jjlarkin@highSNIPland ... 4ax.com>) about 'S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart', on Fri, ... The bad news is that everything is prohibited. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart
    ... I read in sci.electronics.design that Paul Burridge ... d97@4ax.com>) about 'S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart', ... The bad news is that everything is prohibited. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
Quantcast