Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 07/31/04
- Next message: Norm Dresner: "Re: Design for detector of lightning"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: OT: Local Optimization?"
- In reply to: Reg Edwards: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Next in thread: Paul Burridge: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Reply: Paul Burridge: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Reply: Reg Edwards: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 22:22:17 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that Reg Edwards
<g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote (in <cegvp8$gpk$1@hercules.btintern
et.com>) about 'S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart', on Sat, 31
Jul 2004:
>It applied ONLY to the HF spectrum, serious calculating errors occurr if
>applied to the LF spectrum and below although few engineers realised
>this. And still don't.
Could you please explain that a bit more? The chart is a graphical way
of doing mathematics. Where does frequency enter the picture?
If you mean that the characteristic impedances of 'transmission lines'
at low frequencies aren't resistive, I quite agree.
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: Norm Dresner: "Re: Design for detector of lightning"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: OT: Local Optimization?"
- In reply to: Reg Edwards: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Next in thread: Paul Burridge: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Reply: Paul Burridge: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Reply: Reg Edwards: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading