Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart
From: Paul Burridge (pb_at_notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk)
Date: 07/31/04
- Next message: Paul Burridge: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Previous message: Paul Burridge: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- In reply to: John Woodgate: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Next in thread: Jim Thompson: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Reply: Jim Thompson: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 23:48:04 +0100
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 19:24:52 +0100, John Woodgate
<jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:
>I read in sci.electronics.design that Paul Burridge
><pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote (in <n2nng0hvjmgl5ljj1li87onra4sgt0p
>d97@4ax.com>) about 'S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart', on
>Sat, 31 Jul 2004:
>>And as John W said, how do you tell whether the point referred to on the
>>Chart is actually a Y-parameter at all??
>
>No, I didn't say that. Please refrain from citing me in support of your
>inanities.
Sorry John. I didn't mean to imply I was investing any faith in your
all-too-frequently incorrect assertions.
HTH.
-- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
- Next message: Paul Burridge: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Previous message: Paul Burridge: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- In reply to: John Woodgate: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Next in thread: Jim Thompson: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Reply: Jim Thompson: "Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
