Re: S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart

From: Jim Thompson (thegreatone_at_example.com)
Date: 08/01/04 

Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 18:32:34 -0700

On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 23:48:04 +0100, Paul Burridge
<pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote:

>On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 19:24:52 +0100, John Woodgate
><jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:
>
>>I read in sci.electronics.design that Paul Burridge
>><pb@notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk> wrote (in <n2nng0hvjmgl5ljj1li87onra4sgt0p
>>d97@4ax.com>) about 'S - Y Parameter conversion with Smith Chart', on
>>Sat, 31 Jul 2004:
>>>And as John W said, how do you tell whether the point referred to on the
>>>Chart is actually a Y-parameter at all??
>>
>>No, I didn't say that. Please refrain from citing me in support of your
>>inanities.
>
>Sorry John. I didn't mean to imply I was investing any faith in your
>all-too-frequently incorrect assertions.
>HTH.

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I am seeing Burridge's crap today only because I'm using my laptop for
news reading, with no plonk filters, since my main "communications"
machine took a dipsy-doodle and I have it lashed up in backup mode
right now.

Without a doubt Burridge is so obscene as to rank him right up there
with the infamous Robert... except that Robert knew his technology.

Poor Burridge never will.