Re: PCB Design
From: John Larkin (jjlarkin_at_highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com)
Date: 08/09/04
- Next message: John Larkin: "Re: PCB Design"
- Previous message: Francesco: "Re: Problem with measure Rin!"
- In reply to: Anders F: "Re: PCB Design"
- Next in thread: Rich Grise: "Re: PCB Design"
- Reply: Rich Grise: "Re: PCB Design"
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: PCB Design"
- Reply: Anders F: "Re: PCB Design"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 10:19:41 -0700
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 16:54:10 +0200, "Anders F" <af-spam@hi5.dk> wrote:
>Hmm. I'll just sum the points *most* agree on:
>
>Planes are good. Close planes are better!
Exactly. The planes form a combination ultra-low impedance
transmission line and a microwave-quality, nicely lossy capacitor.
>Low inductance in the caps is imortant. Use small / wide caps, very short
>traces and multiple vias.
Not really. The planes are the real HF bypass, and the caps help out
at low frequencies.
>Numbers count. Multiple capacitors lowers the overall inductance.
No; see above. The capacitors add, well, capacitance. The inductance
that a part sees is dominated by its leads and the traces and vias to
the planes.
>Then the "details" like actual numbers and values, that's scary. Presently
>I'm primarily a bit puzzled about the effect of caps above their resonance
>frequency.
If you accept my theory, it all becomes very simple.
John
- Next message: John Larkin: "Re: PCB Design"
- Previous message: Francesco: "Re: Problem with measure Rin!"
- In reply to: Anders F: "Re: PCB Design"
- Next in thread: Rich Grise: "Re: PCB Design"
- Reply: Rich Grise: "Re: PCB Design"
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: PCB Design"
- Reply: Anders F: "Re: PCB Design"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|