Re: Use of wire loop in fence as a proximity detector (?)
From: David Lesher (wb8foz_at_panix.com)
Date: 08/10/04
- Next message: Don: "Re: Replace relative rotary encoder with 2 switches."
- Previous message: Leon Heller: "Re: Replace relative rotary encoder with 2 switches."
- Next in thread: Dave VanHorn: "Re: Use of wire loop in fence as a proximity detector (?)"
- Reply: Dave VanHorn: "Re: Use of wire loop in fence as a proximity detector (?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 03:49:47 +0000 (UTC)
Lots of folks have spend lots of money looking for the 'perfect'
fence system. Last I heard, they still resemble Diogenes...
In general, your false alarm rate in inversely proportional
to the probability of detection. The added factor is price;
the more you spend, the better the ratio....
-- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
- Next message: Don: "Re: Replace relative rotary encoder with 2 switches."
- Previous message: Leon Heller: "Re: Replace relative rotary encoder with 2 switches."
- Next in thread: Dave VanHorn: "Re: Use of wire loop in fence as a proximity detector (?)"
- Reply: Dave VanHorn: "Re: Use of wire loop in fence as a proximity detector (?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
