Re: FTL (Faster Than Light) communications?
From: Kevin Aylward (salesEXTRACT_at_anasoft.co.uk)
Date: 08/15/04
- Next message: Fred Bloggs: "Re: [OT] Lazy Inefficient European Socialist Losers?"
- Previous message: hamilton: "Re: Stepper motor controller IC with microstepping"
- In reply to: Ken Smith: "Re: FTL (Faster Than Light) communications?"
- Next in thread: Mjolinor: "Re: FTL (Faster Than Light) communications?"
- Reply: Mjolinor: "Re: FTL (Faster Than Light) communications?"
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: FTL (Faster Than Light) communications?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 16:32:25 GMT
Ken Smith wrote:
> In article <w2ETc.141739$28.48707@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
> Kevin Aylward <salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote:
> [...]
>> In fact, its the other way round photons *always* travel at "C", i.e.
>> the 3e8 max speed in vacuume.
>
> Yes, existing theory.
>
> [...]
>> *apparent* speed. Atomic electrons absorb photons, go to a hifger
>> energy state, then after a delay, emit a new photon.
>
> Proving that it is really a new photon is a bit tricky. They don't
> have serial numbers.
Oh, you mean like when the photon disappears (gets absorbed) it actually
runs around inside the electron for a bit, then pops out again. Maybe.
Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
- Next message: Fred Bloggs: "Re: [OT] Lazy Inefficient European Socialist Losers?"
- Previous message: hamilton: "Re: Stepper motor controller IC with microstepping"
- In reply to: Ken Smith: "Re: FTL (Faster Than Light) communications?"
- Next in thread: Mjolinor: "Re: FTL (Faster Than Light) communications?"
- Reply: Mjolinor: "Re: FTL (Faster Than Light) communications?"
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: FTL (Faster Than Light) communications?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]