Re: TV preamp FET choice (follow up with more impedance stuff)
From: Ken Smith (kensmith_at_green.rahul.net)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: keith: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Previous message: Marc H.Popek: "Tektronix RF 20 amp cuurent probe A6302 Oscilloscope Re: Wow FA Amazing wirless wi fi"
- In reply to: John S. Dyson: "Re: TV preamp FET choice (follow up with more impedance stuff)"
- Next in thread: John S. Dyson: "Re: TV preamp FET choice (follow up with more impedance stuff)"
- Reply: John S. Dyson: "Re: TV preamp FET choice (follow up with more impedance stuff)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 01:52:40 +0000 (UTC)
In article <ch0k1c$1npv$1@news.iquest.net>,
John S. Dyson <toor@iquest.net> wrote:
[...]
>I strongly suggest looking at devices with input impedance that is fairly
>close to 50 (or 75) ohms.
If you can't find 50 or 75 ohms, try for twice that and parallel two of
them.
[...]
>For low noise RF applications, you probably want to try to find components
>whose input impedance is within 2:1 or 4:1 of the source impedance.
Better yet, look for one where the maker elected to put the noise at
the impedance level you need on the first page of the data ***.
Component companies always (mostly) try to make their part look the best.
As a result, they put the characteristics that are good on page one.
-- -- kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
- Next message: keith: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Previous message: Marc H.Popek: "Tektronix RF 20 amp cuurent probe A6302 Oscilloscope Re: Wow FA Amazing wirless wi fi"
- In reply to: John S. Dyson: "Re: TV preamp FET choice (follow up with more impedance stuff)"
- Next in thread: John S. Dyson: "Re: TV preamp FET choice (follow up with more impedance stuff)"
- Reply: John S. Dyson: "Re: TV preamp FET choice (follow up with more impedance stuff)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]