Re: relection coefficient?
From: Ray Anderson (reanderson_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: 09/05/04
- Next message: Adrian Jansen: "Re: Programmable PCB"
- Previous message: Adrian Jansen: "Re: Cold Fusion warms up?"
- In reply to: John Woodgate: "Re: relection coefficient?"
- Next in thread: Ray Anderson: "Re: relection coefficient?"
- Reply: Ray Anderson: "Re: relection coefficient?"
- Reply: Paul Burridge: "Re: relection coefficient?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 01:59:53 GMT
John Woodgate wrote:
.
>
> The reflection coefficient is always positive, and so the equation
> should be written R = |(Z1 - Zo)/(Z1 + Zo)|. |...| is the 'modulus'
> sign, indication that the answer is to be taken as positive, even if it
> isn't.
>
Consider a TDR, an instrument that measures the reflection coefficient
of a DUT.
If the DUT is, for example, a transmission line which is open circuited
at the far end then the reflected signal will be reflected from the open
circuit in phase with the incident signal and its amplitude will be a
function of the reflection coeeficient (a positive value in this case).
Now consider the same TDR connected to a the same transmission line that
is short circuited at the far end. The signal will be reflected from the
short circuit out of phase with the incident signal (i.e. it will
exhibit a negative reflection coefficient).
The above example cite the extreme boundary conditions (open and short),
however you will see the same effects for intermediate cases where the
load is either > Zo or < Zo.
The sign of rho (the reflection coefficient) does make a difference and
it isn't common practice to only use only the absolute value of rho.
See http://cnx.rice.edu/content/m11379/latest/ for a graphic explanation
on how the reflection coefficient (both postive and negative values) are
used in a "Bounce Diagram" to illustrate how an incident signal's
amplitude varies as it bounces back and forth on a transmission line
with various source and load impedances. For Bounce Diagrams to work you
need to consider the sign of rho.
-Ray
- Next message: Adrian Jansen: "Re: Programmable PCB"
- Previous message: Adrian Jansen: "Re: Cold Fusion warms up?"
- In reply to: John Woodgate: "Re: relection coefficient?"
- Next in thread: Ray Anderson: "Re: relection coefficient?"
- Reply: Ray Anderson: "Re: relection coefficient?"
- Reply: Paul Burridge: "Re: relection coefficient?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|