Re: PIC18F458 sample assembly program
From: Wouter van Ooijen (wouter_at_voti.nl)
Date: 09/11/04
- Next message: Kevin Aylward: "Re: FET transfer function - best and worst cases"
- Previous message: Tony Williams: "Re: FET transfer function - best and worst cases"
- In reply to: Mortel: "PIC18F458 sample assembly program"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 07:16:40 GMT
>I worked a little bit with the PIC16F84A on some projects. Now, as a
>hobbyist, I need a bigger microcontroller and I chose the PIC18F458.
Why the 18F458, do you need the CAN interface? If not take the 18F452,
it is the same chip but without CAN, which halves the data***.
Choosing an 18F is OK, but if you want a smaller data*** you could
consider a 16F688 or a 16F88 or a 16F877A.
Wouter van Ooijen
-- ------------------------------------
http://www.voti.nl
PICmicro chips, programmers, consulting
- Next message: Kevin Aylward: "Re: FET transfer function - best and worst cases"
- Previous message: Tony Williams: "Re: FET transfer function - best and worst cases"
- In reply to: Mortel: "PIC18F458 sample assembly program"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
