Re: What does this have to do with electronics?
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 09/12/04
- Next message: John Woodgate: "Re: anyone familiar with this topology?"
- Previous message: Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund: "Re: Any good ideas on this circuit problem?"
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: What does this have to do with electronics?"
- Next in thread: Kevin Aylward: "Re: What does this have to do with electronics?"
- Reply: Kevin Aylward: "Re: What does this have to do with electronics?"
- Reply: Rich Grise: "Re: What does this have to do with electronics?"
- Reply: Rich Grise: "Re: What does this have to do with electronics?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 10:19:30 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that Kevin Aylward
<salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote (in <WFT0d.22661$F73.3169@fe2.news.bl
ueyonder.co.uk>) about 'What does this have to do with electronics?', on
Sun, 12 Sep 2004:
Some rude person wrote:
>> I keep trying to tell you, Aylward, that just because you don't
>> believe in something, doesn't make it not so.
>>
>
>I keep trying to tell you, lack of proof that there is not something
>else out there, is no basis to form a conjecture that there is.
I think that's too hard. I think it's not unreasonable to base a
*conjecture* (no more) on a lack of satisfaction with an explanation.
There are several precedents; Mendeleev's conjecture of the Periodic
Table, being not satisfied with Newlands' Law of Octaves, general
dissatisfaction with the proliferation of sub-atomic particles, leading
to the 'quark' conjecture (as it then was).
What is NOT sensible is to base anything MORE than a conjecture, i.e. a
hypothesis and especially not a theory, on mere dissatisfaction. A
hypothesis has to be testable to be come a theory, and a theory has to
predict further falsifiable results.
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: John Woodgate: "Re: anyone familiar with this topology?"
- Previous message: Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund: "Re: Any good ideas on this circuit problem?"
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: What does this have to do with electronics?"
- Next in thread: Kevin Aylward: "Re: What does this have to do with electronics?"
- Reply: Kevin Aylward: "Re: What does this have to do with electronics?"
- Reply: Rich Grise: "Re: What does this have to do with electronics?"
- Reply: Rich Grise: "Re: What does this have to do with electronics?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|