Re: Arghhh : Awefully bad noise figures in voltage DACs...
From: Joerg (notthisjoergsch_at_removethispacbell.net)
Date: 09/13/04
- Next message: Ken Taylor: "Re: Mushroom Cloud Reported Over North Korea"
- Previous message: Ken Taylor: "Re: Kerry's Improbable Medals"
- In reply to: John Larkin: "Re: Arghhh : Awefully bad noise figures in voltage DACs..."
- Next in thread: John Larkin: "Re: Arghhh : Awefully bad noise figures in voltage DACs..."
- Reply: John Larkin: "Re: Arghhh : Awefully bad noise figures in voltage DACs..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:35:27 GMT
Hi John,
>Oh, as long as I'm raining on your parade, be aware that most serial
>DACs have nasty clock feedthrough, so expect spikes and perhaps some
>DC offset while you're clocking the data in.
>
>For lowest noise, use an external ref and a DAC that requires an
>external opamp. All you want inside the DAC is the switches and the
>thinfilm resistors.
>
>
Or use a sample and hold. SD5400 are really nice for that purpose. The
S/H needs good RF isolation else the spikes barrel right through. No
autorouter here.
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com
- Next message: Ken Taylor: "Re: Mushroom Cloud Reported Over North Korea"
- Previous message: Ken Taylor: "Re: Kerry's Improbable Medals"
- In reply to: John Larkin: "Re: Arghhh : Awefully bad noise figures in voltage DACs..."
- Next in thread: John Larkin: "Re: Arghhh : Awefully bad noise figures in voltage DACs..."
- Reply: John Larkin: "Re: Arghhh : Awefully bad noise figures in voltage DACs..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|