Re: Bush Supporter Selected at Random WAS Re: Kerry's Blah Blah Blah
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 09/15/04
- Next message: John Woodgate: "Re: Why DC instead of AC for power transmission?"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: Bush and overtime!"
- In reply to: John Fields: "Re: Bush Supporter Selected at Random WAS Re: Kerry's Blah Blah Blah"
- Next in thread: Glenn Gundlach: "Re: Kerry's Improbable Medals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:01:50 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that John Fields <jfields@austininstrum
ents.com> wrote (in <820ek0999pitl7u7r3umiujnem41ajihgl@4ax.com>) about
'Bush Supporter Selected at Random WAS Re: Kerry's Blah Blah Blah', on
Tue, 14 Sep 2004:
>On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 03:02:46 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Based on the sampling of SED, the official stat is that Bush supporter
> ^
> a ? ;)
>>selected at random will have IQ<60.
>>
Well, some here would like it to say 'the'. (;-)
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: John Woodgate: "Re: Why DC instead of AC for power transmission?"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: Bush and overtime!"
- In reply to: John Fields: "Re: Bush Supporter Selected at Random WAS Re: Kerry's Blah Blah Blah"
- Next in thread: Glenn Gundlach: "Re: Kerry's Improbable Medals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
