Re: Engineering Environment
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 09/15/04
- Next message: Clarence: "Re: Kerry and the 14th Amendment"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: Bush and overtime!"
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Engineering Environment"
- Next in thread: Joerg: "Re: Engineering Environment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 22:33:11 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that Kevin Aylward
<salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote (in <O522d.4230$U04.2409@fe1.news.blu
eyonder.co.uk>) about 'Engineering Environment', on Wed, 15 Sep 2004:
>But you really need to understand the structure of the theory, to see
>just why it is a good theory.
It's a real theory? Then what are its testable (preferably tested)
predictions?
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: Clarence: "Re: Kerry and the 14th Amendment"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: Bush and overtime!"
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Engineering Environment"
- Next in thread: Joerg: "Re: Engineering Environment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]