Re: incredible
From: John Larkin (jjlarkin_at_highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com)
Date: 09/16/04
- Next message: mountains_at_iname.com: "Re: I'm a republican and I'm voting for Kerry"
- Previous message: John Larkin: "Re: Fet scope probe design recommendations"
- In reply to: Frithiof Andreas Jensen: "Re: incredible"
- Next in thread: Clarence: "Re: incredible"
- Reply: Clarence: "Re: incredible"
- Reply: Frank Bemelman: "Re: incredible"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 07:15:00 -0700
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:21:12 +0200, "Frithiof Andreas Jensen"
<frithiof.jensen@die_spammer_die.ericsson.com> wrote:
>The last part is probably *why* the memory separation features are not
>commonly used - the performance cost of memeory protection will make Games
>suck!
Or maybe because Bill has always liked self-modifying code.
>Embedded systems are big on memory protection and one observes that
>embedded's do not chrash much ;-)
My embedded systems are flat-addressing, non-MMU, unprotected, and
they don't crash. That's because they don't have bugs.
John
- Next message: mountains_at_iname.com: "Re: I'm a republican and I'm voting for Kerry"
- Previous message: John Larkin: "Re: Fet scope probe design recommendations"
- In reply to: Frithiof Andreas Jensen: "Re: incredible"
- Next in thread: Clarence: "Re: incredible"
- Reply: Clarence: "Re: incredible"
- Reply: Frank Bemelman: "Re: incredible"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
