Re: Fet scope probe design recommendations
From: Mike Monett (gqtacfwfjfmx_at_spammotel.com)
Date: 09/17/04
- Next message: Joerg: "Re: Test"
- Previous message: Rich Grise: "Re: What does this have to do with electronics?"
- In reply to: Paul Burridge: "Re: Fet scope probe design recommendations"
- Next in thread: Paul Burridge: "Re: Fet scope probe design recommendations"
- Reply: Paul Burridge: "Re: Fet scope probe design recommendations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:55:16 -0400
Paul Burridge wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:13:27 -0400, Mike Monett <no@spam.com> wrote:
>
> >John specified "fast". For him, "fast" starts at about 10GHz, and you
> >need a 50 ohm environment to work at these frequencies. In fact, pretty
> >much anything above 1GHz should be 50 ohm.
>
> Okay, fine. Like VNAs you mean? But doesn't that limit that type of
> scope to RF work only and even then at points in the board where the
> characteristic impedance reverts to 50 ohms? I mean, I can't see it
> being much use to check signals from any hi-Z impedance source!
The problem is to acquire the signal with minimum loading and enough
bandwidth to represent the waveform, and transport the signal to the
measuring instrument (VNA, spectrum analyzer, scope, etc.)
The solution is to use a resistive probe as we have been discussing, a
standard 10MEG 10X probe, or a FET or bipolar active probe. At low and medium
frequencies, the choice depends on the desired bandwidth and circuit
impedance. At high frequencies, the circuit impedances are low so a resistive
probe is a good choice.
Getting the signal to the instrument is another problem. For a 10X probe, a
low-capacitance cable is needed. This means a very thin center conductor
which is fragile and has higher loss at high frequencies.
For 50 ohms, a short length of RG-174 is ok up to about 1GHz, but as others
have mentioned, the losses start to round the signal edges at higher
frequencies. This becomes noticeable with the EclinPs Plus with risetimes of
160pS or so.
So you need a better cable, such as RG-58, which is harder to handle. As John
mentioned, the problem gets worse the higher you go, which may be the reason
scopes top out at 70GHz.
A partial solution to the transport problem is to convert the signal right at
the source to minimize the cable losses. I believe both Tek and HP offer
remote pods for their samplers. Also, Picosecond Pulse offers 25GHz and
100GHz sampler modules which can be mounted close to the signal to minimize
loss:
http://www.picosecond.com/products/category.asp?pd_id=17
Mike
- Next message: Joerg: "Re: Test"
- Previous message: Rich Grise: "Re: What does this have to do with electronics?"
- In reply to: Paul Burridge: "Re: Fet scope probe design recommendations"
- Next in thread: Paul Burridge: "Re: Fet scope probe design recommendations"
- Reply: Paul Burridge: "Re: Fet scope probe design recommendations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|