Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper"
From: Kevin Aylward (salesEXTRACT_at_anasoft.co.uk)
Date: 09/18/04
- Next message: Fred Bloggs: "Re: OT: Bush Thugs Rough Up Grieving Mother of KIA"
- Previous message: Genome: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- In reply to: Paul Burridge: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Next in thread: Clarence: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: Clarence: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: Paul Burridge: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:37:44 GMT
Paul Burridge wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 13:41:49 GMT, "Kevin Aylward"
> <salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> And just what spelling mistakes would these be?
>
> Er, the ones where you use a word which is correctly spelled - but for
> an altogether different meaning.
>
>> Look, dude, the papers are done in Front Page. It underlines all
>> spelling errors in red. Nothing is underlined. Well except for the
>> ones where I invented some new words.
>
> LOL! You're in a class of your own, Kev, you really are! :-D
> Now seriously, let's examine the intro to your seminal masterwork that
> Rich pointed us to:
>
> "One of the principle understandings with the theory is the
> explanations of why the behavior of men and women are fundamentally
> different. Why have codes of conduct developed that are decidedly
> asymmetrical? How has culture evolved and why dose much of it appear
> to have with no apparent biological evolutionary advantage?"
>
> This is a prime example of what I've stated before many times. If you
> can't see anything wrong
Ok, so there as added "gained" and "with".
>with this lot you're in serious need of some
> evening classes in remedial English.
Don't be daft. Look, its easy to make trivial errors when you write as
much as I do. What's important is the content. maybe you should try
doing these sometime. Provide some actual content.
>Sorry, Kev, but no one's going to
> take you seriously with that many howlers packed into a single
> paragraph. The proof reading suggestion was totally apposite. Ask John
> Fields if he can help you. ;-)
I'd certainly rather make a few English mistakes, then have the
reputation that you have gained in these electronics NGs. I would
suggest that many here take me very seriously. Like, how many really
wants to go a few sparing rounds with me on electronics theory?
Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
- Next message: Fred Bloggs: "Re: OT: Bush Thugs Rough Up Grieving Mother of KIA"
- Previous message: Genome: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- In reply to: Paul Burridge: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Next in thread: Clarence: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: Clarence: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: Paul Burridge: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]