Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper"
From: Kevin Aylward (salesEXTRACT_at_anasoft.co.uk)
Date: 09/18/04
- Next message: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Previous message: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- In reply to: John Fields: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Next in thread: John Fields: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: John Fields: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 19:08:00 GMT
John Fields wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 17:34:20 GMT, "Kevin Aylward"
> <salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Clarence wrote:
>
>>> Just delete the entire thing, then no one can complain!
>>
>> In a way, I sort of agree, in the sense, that most of what I am
>> writing should be trivially obvious, requiring no explanation ata
>> all. i.e.
>>
>> "That which is mostly observed, is that which replicates the most."
>>
>> The papers are knee high just to explain this, and what it means.
>> Unfortunately, all those religious individuals don't see the forest
>> for the trees are in the way.
>
> ---
> So what? Your job, as a writer, is to recognize and overcome that
> roablock if you want your ideas to come alive in the minds of your
> readers, not to come up with excuses why you can't.
I agree. If someone points out a valid issue. I will address it.
However, this has been blown way out of all proportion.
>
> Religious and political views contrary to your own, a poor command of
> the language,
I do not have a "poor" command of the English language in the slightest.
I have an *average* command of the English language. Do you have any
idea just how many are illiterate? I just write more, so there are more
visible mistakes.
Being "not good" is not being "bad". There is a middle ground. Its so
easy, to ignore the 99% that's right when only 1% is wrong. The 1%
failures are what stick out. If I design 100 circuits and one fails, am
I a bad designer?
That's why this whole thread is joke. If I was as bad as what the
overall feel is coming across in this thread, I would be spending all
day slapping my wrist with my other left hand.
>and on and on, ad infinitum, are all roadblocks you must
> overcome if you expect to be read in the way you want to be read.
> ---
>
>> The other issue, is that one's wives don't want to accept that we men
>> shag as many other women as possible when ever we can, either. They
>> just dont want to buy into that we are inherently programmed by our
>> genes to acting in said manner...
>
> ---
> Ah, yessss!!!
>
> "Well, your honor, I had that box of matches, so what else was I
> supposed to do???" ;^)
Indeed.
Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
- Next message: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Previous message: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- In reply to: John Fields: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Next in thread: John Fields: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: John Fields: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]