Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper"
From: Clarence (No_at_No.Com)
Date: 09/18/04
- Next message: Clarence: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Previous message: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Next in thread: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: Rich Grise: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 19:06:26 GMT
"Kevin Aylward" <salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote in message
news:u7%2d.25903$U04.4032@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> Clarence wrote:
> > "Kevin Aylward" <salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:ePZ2d.25455$U04.18698@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> >> Genome wrote:
> >>> "John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote in message
> >>> news:zmK5fhEz9FTBFwSK@jmwa.demon.co.uk...
> >>>> Kevin, like many other electronic engineers of high intelligence,
> >>>> is somewhat dyslexic. It is not at all unusual for this to be
> >>>> accompanied by 'denial' in the psychological sense.
> >>>
> >>>> So DON'T continue to criticize Kevin for something he has no
> >>>> control over and will not believe you about anyway.
You have that right. He seems to believe that he should "fight it out on this
line if it takes all summer." What a waste. But I agree he seems to have no
control at all. He is predestined to be wrong in someones eyes all his life.
Possibly too much "shagging" when his wife wasn't looking. Oh, is he married?
Can't imagine a woman tolerating that kind of behavior.
> >>> CRAP
> >> None of us has any control over anything we do:-)
> > MORE CRAP!
>
> *Prove*, and I mean *prove* that you have control over what you do, or
> go away.
Proof? I didn't go away. And won't until I get bored with your inane and
infantile insults.
> Its clear now, that you are way to incompetent to understand anything
> that you have been posting on regarding these subject matters. You are
> simply out of your intellectual depth, so go away, anyway.
I am writing this, even thought "You" said to go away. I'll decide for myself
when I will or will not do anything.
I am surprised that you would make a feeble attempt to insult, since it is your
ability to clearly express that pet idea you have which is the subject. I only
offer a bit of advice. Like a real suggestion that by removing it you can
avoid further embarrassment.
You may choose to ignore my advice, I do not charge for it, and do not enforce
my views on anyone by demanding some arbitrary "proof" for something so obvious
as individual choice. A proof you can't be qualified to judge since you've not
yet mastered an ability to clearly explain what your pet idea is. Perhaps some
introspection is due?
By the way your entire premise is faulty.
However I have no intention in attempting to tell you why. You won't listen,
preferring to argue, likely you know it and don't care, and it is really only a
troll trick to try to keep people off balance while you gleefully stick pins
into them.
- Next message: Clarence: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Previous message: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Next in thread: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: Rich Grise: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|