Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper"
From: Don Pearce (donald_at_pearce.uk.com)
Date: 09/18/04
- Next message: Clarence: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Previous message: Guy Macon: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 19:10:28 GMT
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 19:07:22 GMT, "Kevin Aylward"
<salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote:
>> That would certainly be true for something dashed off quickly, like a
>> Usenet post, but not for a web page that has doubtless gone through
>> several revisions before publishing.
>
>Nope.
>
>I write quickly and post it. I don't do much checking. Writing is just a
>necessary evil that one needs to do to get things out. Writing excellent
>prose is just not something that has much interest for me.
When you post a paper on a web page, you are publishing. That sort of
attitude is simply not good enough and it reflects very poorly on the
content. It is not simply that the prose is poor - it is impenetrable.
Unfortunately the actual content, when you have battled your way
through, is not worth the effort.
d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
- Next message: Clarence: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Previous message: Guy Macon: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|