Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper"

From: Paul Burridge (pb_at_notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk)
Date: 09/18/04 

Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:01:25 +0100

On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 16:37:44 GMT, "Kevin Aylward"
<salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote:

>Paul Burridge wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 13:41:49 GMT, "Kevin Aylward"
>> <salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> And just what spelling mistakes would these be?
>>
>> Er, the ones where you use a word which is correctly spelled - but for
>> an altogether different meaning.
>>
>>> Look, dude, the papers are done in Front Page. It underlines all
>>> spelling errors in red. Nothing is underlined. Well except for the
>>> ones where I invented some new words.
>>
>> LOL! You're in a class of your own, Kev, you really are! :-D
>> Now seriously, let's examine the intro to your seminal masterwork that
>> Rich pointed us to:
>>
>> "One of the principle understandings with the theory is the
>> explanations of why the behavior of men and women are fundamentally
>> different. Why have codes of conduct developed that are decidedly
>> asymmetrical? How has culture evolved and why dose much of it appear
>> to have with no apparent biological evolutionary advantage?"
>>
>> This is a prime example of what I've stated before many times. If you
>> can't see anything wrong
>
>Ok, so there as added "gained" and "with".

Again, no idea what the hell you're talking about here.

>Don't be daft. Look, its easy to make trivial errors when you write as
>much as I do. What's important is the content. maybe you should try
>doing these sometime. Provide some actual content.

Most of what I post is on-topic - probably more than most folk here.
Content's all very well if it's appropriate to an electronics design
forum. WTF has evolution got to do with it? Plus your errors are far
from trivial; they make your papers virtually unreadable AFAICS.

>I'd certainly rather make a few English mistakes, then have the
>reputation that you have gained in these electronics NGs.

FFS, Kev! I'm not claiming to be an expert in electronics. I proclaim
my ignorance in the field for all to see. I don't *care* about having
a reputation in a field that I don't work in. What's it going to cost
me? Nothing!
Aside from that, your English is simply *atrocious* - there's no other
word for it IMV. Sorry, but that's how I see it, anyway. Genome may
differ.

>I would
>suggest that many here take me very seriously. Like, how many really
>wants to go a few sparing rounds with me on electronics theory?

No idea. I've never questioned your aptitude for electronics, though. 

-- 
"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Now what will he do? (Too perfect!)
    ... edwin-lost thinks he's in electronics, or has claimed so, and by that ... also thinks he's infallible about computers. ... You must be trying to earn a reputation for being senile. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: The Results of everyones help.
    ... I like such explanations which let me work as ... exactly that, an explanation for beginners? ... > real education or experience in electronics, ... articles for all the readers, in the present and in the future. ...
    (sci.electronics.basics)
  • Re: HP prints nonsense and will not stop!
    ... Heat problem inside printer affecting the electronics. ...
    (comp.periphs.printers)