Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper"
From: Rich Grise (null_at_example.net)
Date: 09/19/04
- Next message: Robert Wolcott: "CLARIFICATION"
- Previous message: Rich Grise: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Next in thread: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 00:45:39 GMT
On Saturday 18 September 2004 12:07 pm, Kevin Aylward did deign to grace us
with the following:
> Don Pearce wrote:
>> That would certainly be true for something dashed off quickly, like a
>> Usenet post, but not for a web page that has doubtless gone through
>> several revisions before publishing.
>
> Nope.
>
> I write quickly and post it. I don't do much checking. Writing is just a
> necessary evil that one needs to do to get things out. Writing excellent
> prose is just not something that has much interest for me.
>
So, the only logical conclusion is that your scientific research and
study are as sloppy, irresponsible, and incorrect as your writing, therefore
you are full of ***.
QED.
- Next message: Robert Wolcott: "CLARIFICATION"
- Previous message: Rich Grise: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Next in thread: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]