Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper"
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 09/23/04
- Next message: John Woodgate: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Previous message: martin griffith: "Re: Custom Meter Dials"
- In reply to: xray: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Next in thread: Dirk Bruere at Neopax: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: Dirk Bruere at Neopax: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: xray: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:02:20 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that xray <notreally@hotmail.invalid>
wrote (in <3l75l0tbjujuunqjvjg3rvccshduene283@4ax.com>) about '[OT]:
Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper"', on Thu, 23 Sep 2004:
>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:27:04 +0100, John Woodgate
><jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:
>
>>This is obviously complete nonsense, as can be proved by the presence of
>>this glaring grammatical error:
>>
>>The phenomena was also seemingly capable of extending itself not only
>>into the walls of the room, but both other rooms and on several
>>occasions to the locations of absent members.
>
>What, specifically, is glaring in that?
>
'Phenomena' is plural, and the plural verb is used with it in other
parts of the text. The singular is 'phenomenon'.
But you DO realise that my post was a dig at those who become apoplectic
about such things, don't you?
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: John Woodgate: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Previous message: martin griffith: "Re: Custom Meter Dials"
- In reply to: xray: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Next in thread: Dirk Bruere at Neopax: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: Dirk Bruere at Neopax: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Reply: xray: "Re: [OT]: Ping Kevin Aylward - re your "scientific paper""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|