Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 09/23/04
- Next message: John Woodgate: "Re: safe electronic brain stimulator"
- Previous message: colin: "Re: OPA695 current feedback amplifier"
- In reply to: Fred Bloggs: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Next in thread: Fred Bloggs: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:22:44 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote (in <4152D7A1.1080706@nospam.com>) about '[OT]: The not-so-
democratic Democrats', on Thu, 23 Sep 2004:
>The Bush administration is too
>stupid to avoid legitimate condemnation even in this over-priced public
>relations document. The hallmark of the Bush administration from the
>start has been to falsify and withhold executive branch government data
>across the board. But when it comes to blatant political propaganda,
>they really open those channels, and as usual they are incredibly
>deceitful, publishing this highly charged political paper under the
>guise of an engineering administrative report.
GWB has been taking lessons form his British chum (he's Scottish, not
English). When Tony Blair wants to shorten an e-mail, he writes:
[spin]
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: John Woodgate: "Re: safe electronic brain stimulator"
- Previous message: colin: "Re: OPA695 current feedback amplifier"
- In reply to: Fred Bloggs: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Next in thread: Fred Bloggs: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|