Re: sci.electronics.serene
From: Mac (foo_at_bar.net)
Date: 09/24/04
- Next message: Phil Hobbs: "Re: Crystal drift"
- Previous message: Tom Seim: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- In reply to: Paul Burridge: "sci.electronics.serene"
- Next in thread: Phil Hobbs: "Re: sci.electronics.serene"
- Reply: Phil Hobbs: "Re: sci.electronics.serene"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: sci.electronics.serene"
- Reply: Robert Monsen: "Re: sci.electronics.serene"
- Reply: Rich Grise: "Re: sci.electronics.serene"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 03:54:14 GMT
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:39:38 +0100, Paul Burridge wrote:
>
> Hi, not-quite-all,
>
> Since I carried out a long-overdue cull of the worst deadwood on this
> group, the signal/noise ratio has improved no end. All those dreadful,
> unending eponymous threads with sh*t-for-brains in the subject header
> no longer pollute my monitor and I can live in peace with my computer
> again. OT stuff by OT posters is no longer tolerated!
> I heartily recommend aggressive pruning of all the OT *** on this
> newsgroup. Learn to love Usenet again...
>
> Peace be with some of you...
>
> p.
This post made me think of something funny. What if there were two (or
more) different factions in a newsgroup who mutually plonked each other.
For the most part, they wouldn't see each others posts, but they could
still communicate in this forum with their faction mates (so to speak).
Kind of like orthogonal codes.
Kind of funny.
--Mac
- Next message: Phil Hobbs: "Re: Crystal drift"
- Previous message: Tom Seim: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- In reply to: Paul Burridge: "sci.electronics.serene"
- Next in thread: Phil Hobbs: "Re: sci.electronics.serene"
- Reply: Phil Hobbs: "Re: sci.electronics.serene"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: sci.electronics.serene"
- Reply: Robert Monsen: "Re: sci.electronics.serene"
- Reply: Rich Grise: "Re: sci.electronics.serene"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]