Re: [*PLONK*]: Kevin Aylward now killfiled.

From: Kevin Aylward (salesEXTRACT_at_anasoft.co.uk)
Date: 09/24/04 

Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:45:08 GMT

Guy Macon wrote:
> Kevin Aylward <salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> says...
>
>> What an uneducated bumpkin you are.
>
> There is no content to be had here. Kevin Aylward subsitutes
> childish namecalling for reasoned discourse.

Er... dude, the bit of post that you sniped was the originator making a
statement of no content. There was argument to reason against.

You have been given lots of reasoned discourse. Like, axioms,
deductions, arguments forming conclusions hint: its the paper you are
unable to understand due to lack of competence. Ignore my insults. Then
go back and actually read what you have posted. Now imagine trying to
convince an uninterested party, i.e. one with no axe to grind, how you
would actually convince them that the *content* of the papers, say,
contradicted known science, as you have claimed many times.

Why don't you see that you have only made claims, with no content? For
example, what *specifically* do you find at issue with my definitions?
Do you see an error in my mathematical derivation of the "observed the
most" statement? What is the logical flaw you have discovered in my
argument to explain some known characteristics of Fashion?

Do I have to go on? Its hard being honest with oneself. To wit:

"A good scientist tries to find evidence to support his theory, a better
scientist tries to find evidence that contradicts his theory" - Richard
Fynmann.

How long do you think I have been working on my papers, including past
information? How long have you been looking at them? Who has the
greatest probability of being mistaken on them? Does a Have you even
read "The selfish Gene" - Richard Dawkins?

Stand back and actually prove to *yourself* that you have a *logical*
basis for your views. For example, having Porridge pat you on the back,
is that really credible? Its that truly confirmation. Have you actually
seen his other posts over the last year? What about Clarence, what
evidence do you have that suggests his view have any value? The fact
that you don't like me, has no bearing on my validated skill set. I
suspect you will continue to huff and puff, and get het up, and make
some sort of excuse why my questions above, are invalid. Then stand back
and ask yourself, why are you huffing and puffing about them? You can
either answer them, or you cant. If you cant, do you really believe its
credible to blame it all on the grammar?

You have been giving a needed kick up the arse. Don't waste the
experience.

Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.