Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats
From: Rich Grise (null_at_example.net)
Date: 09/24/04
- Next message: Rich Grise: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Previous message: Rich Grise: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- In reply to: John Larkin: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Next in thread: John Woodgate: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Reply: John Woodgate: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Reply: John Larkin: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:28:16 GMT
On Friday 24 September 2004 09:47 am, John Larkin did deign to grace us with
the following:
> to be reminded (if they do.) And his Iraq failure-wishing isn't
I wish someone would please define for me what exactly "success" would be
in Iraq?
Complete extermination of Islam? 'Cause it's sounding increasingly like
that's the ultimate goal - to force everybody on the planet to accept
white american pseudochristianity or something.
Can anybody in the country finish this sentence:
The Goal of the American Mission in Iraq is to: _______________________
in 25 words or less? Preferably no more than three or four?
Thanks,
Rich
- Next message: Rich Grise: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Previous message: Rich Grise: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- In reply to: John Larkin: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Next in thread: John Woodgate: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Reply: John Woodgate: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Reply: John Larkin: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|