Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 09/26/04
- Next message: Spehro Pefhany: "Re: ELF detector"
- Previous message: Hal Leemux: "Re: Double throw momentary switch question"
- In reply to: Fred Bloggs: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Next in thread: Fred Bloggs: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Reply: Fred Bloggs: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:16:06 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote (in <4156B5B7.1070504@nospam.com>) about '[OT]: The not-so-
democratic Democrats', on Sun, 26 Sep 2004:
>If by "Iraquis" you mean the American trained security force, then they
>are regarded as collaborators- a universally detested life form.
Trust you to put the worst possible interpretation on the situation.
Actually, I meant the British-trained Iraquis, who are just like our
friendly British police. The fact that the latter appear not to be
friendly with Burrage has, no doubt, a simple interpretation, not
requiring an extensive knowledge of quantum mechanics.
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: Spehro Pefhany: "Re: ELF detector"
- Previous message: Hal Leemux: "Re: Double throw momentary switch question"
- In reply to: Fred Bloggs: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Next in thread: Fred Bloggs: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Reply: Fred Bloggs: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|