Re: Patents, Prior Art, Publication and Usenet.
From: Clifford Heath (no_at_spam.please.net)
Date: 09/26/04
- Next message: Rich Grise: "Re: OT: Memes Vs. Free Will"
- Previous message: Clifford Heath: "Re: OT: Memes Vs. Free Will"
- In reply to: ChrisGibboGibson: "Patents, Prior Art, Publication and Usenet."
- Next in thread: Rich Grise: "Re: Patents, Prior Art, Publication and Usenet."
- Reply: Rich Grise: "Re: Patents, Prior Art, Publication and Usenet."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 02:12:46 +1000
ChrisGibboGibson wrote:
> If I was to
> publish details on the net, would that qualify as prior art/publication such
> that if any one else tried to patent the idea, then that application could be
> refused
Yes. But it would be better if you had documentary evidence to back
it up, such as a registered dated deposition lodged with a third party
containing the salient details. If you get sued, you drag it out.
Better still if you published it in a magazine or journal.
- Next message: Rich Grise: "Re: OT: Memes Vs. Free Will"
- Previous message: Clifford Heath: "Re: OT: Memes Vs. Free Will"
- In reply to: ChrisGibboGibson: "Patents, Prior Art, Publication and Usenet."
- Next in thread: Rich Grise: "Re: Patents, Prior Art, Publication and Usenet."
- Reply: Rich Grise: "Re: Patents, Prior Art, Publication and Usenet."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]