Re: ELF detector
From: Charles W. Johson Jr. (qrus19_at_mindsprUng.com)
Date: 09/26/04
- Next message: Ken Smith: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Previous message: Charles W. Johson Jr.: "Re: Battery level tester."
- In reply to: John Woodgate: "Re: ELF detector"
- Next in thread: Ed Price: "Re: ELF detector"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:17:29 GMT
"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote in message
news:SFdBncC3znVBFwEZ@jmwa.demon.co.uk...
>I read in sci.electronics.design that Robert Baer
> <robertbaer@earthlink.net> wrote (in <4156705F.31F860EE@earthlink.net>)
> about 'ELF detector', on Sun, 26 Sep 2004:
>>John Woodgate wrote:
>>>
>>> I read in sci.electronics.design that Ken Smith
>>> <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote (in <cj4o62$g7l$8@blue.rahul.net>)
>>> about 'ELF detector', on Sat, 25 Sep 2004:
>>>
>>> >I doubt software can do it. You need to divide by zero. Most
>>> >programmers have a hard time writing code that does that successfully.
>>>
>>> IF DIVISOR = 0, THEN RESULT = 1E+38 ELSE RESULT = DIVIDEND/DIVISOR
>>>
>>> It's the order in which you write it that matters. (;-)
>>> --
>>> Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
>>> The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
>>> The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
>>> http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
>>
>> ORDER??????????
>> What is *that*??
>
> Ask your friendly local Marine sergeant.
> --
> Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
> The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
> The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
> http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
Friendly?
Charles
- Next message: Ken Smith: "Re: [OT]: The not-so-democratic Democrats"
- Previous message: Charles W. Johson Jr.: "Re: Battery level tester."
- In reply to: John Woodgate: "Re: ELF detector"
- Next in thread: Ed Price: "Re: ELF detector"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
