Re: OT: Memes Vs. Free Will
From: steve (bungalow_steve_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/26/04
- Next message: Tom Woodrow: "Re: Teflon standoffs?"
- Previous message: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: Driving LEDs - high-power flash"
- In reply to: Rich Grise: "OT: Memes Vs. Free Will"
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: [OT]: Memes Vs. Free Will"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: [OT]: Memes Vs. Free Will"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Sep 2004 11:33:07 -0700
Rich Grise <null@example.net> wrote in message news:<a2o5d.1352$dt2.275@trnddc09>...
> The reason "some people" don't believe in free will is that their
> memes have overridden their freewill, much like a command line
> switch overrides an environment variable. ;-)
>
> Cheers!
> Rich
Garbage, free will is a religious concept (note the word "believe" in
your sentence), no one has yet even precisely defined it, let alone
prove that anyone has it or whether it has been overridden by memes.
- Next message: Tom Woodrow: "Re: Teflon standoffs?"
- Previous message: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: Driving LEDs - high-power flash"
- In reply to: Rich Grise: "OT: Memes Vs. Free Will"
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: [OT]: Memes Vs. Free Will"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: [OT]: Memes Vs. Free Will"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]