Re: Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited
From: Dave VanHorn (dvanhorn_at_cedar.net)
Date: 10/03/04
- Next message: Dave VanHorn: "Re: Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited"
- Previous message: Dave VanHorn: "Re: Why don't all CD4000 chips have Schmitt inputs?"
- In reply to: John Woodgate: "Re: Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited"
- Next in thread: John Woodgate: "Re: Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited"
- Reply: John Woodgate: "Re: Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 10:10:30 -0500
>>In the end, it was a
>>reverse-polarized screw that everyone noticed, and everyone discarded as
>>a problem source.
>
> A WHAT?
You heard me..
The screw was holding a transistor and it's heat sink, to the PCB.
It was supposed to be installed pointing up, with the nut on top, so that
the extra length pointed up into the heat sink area.. They installed it
pointing down, because it was easier to handle. This made the screw contact
the can of an electrolytic.
Now, the can is insulated from the cap terminals, > 10Mohms
Why did this cause the reg to go up in flames?
-- KC6ETE Dave's Engineering Page, www.dvanhorn.org Microcontroller Consultant, specializing in Atmel AVR
- Next message: Dave VanHorn: "Re: Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited"
- Previous message: Dave VanHorn: "Re: Why don't all CD4000 chips have Schmitt inputs?"
- In reply to: John Woodgate: "Re: Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited"
- Next in thread: John Woodgate: "Re: Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited"
- Reply: John Woodgate: "Re: Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|