Re: OT: Bush FLOPS the Debate
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 10/03/04
- Next message: Fred Bloggs: "Re: The Rational Mind of Fred Bloggs"
- Previous message: Jim Thompson: "Re: The Rational Mind of Fred Bloggs"
- In reply to: Rolavine: "Re: OT: Bush FLOPS the Debate"
- Next in thread: Julie: "Re: OT: Bush FLOPS the Debate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:11:04 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that Rolavine <rolavine@aol.com> wrote
(in <20041003130707.03602.00001745@mb-m04.aol.com>) about 'OT: Bush
FLOPS the Debate', on Sun, 3 Oct 2004:
> "Yeah, I understand what it means to be the commander in chief."
Wasn't it you that kept writing 'commander AND chief'?
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: Fred Bloggs: "Re: The Rational Mind of Fred Bloggs"
- Previous message: Jim Thompson: "Re: The Rational Mind of Fred Bloggs"
- In reply to: Rolavine: "Re: OT: Bush FLOPS the Debate"
- Next in thread: Julie: "Re: OT: Bush FLOPS the Debate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
