Re: Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 10/03/04
- Next message: John Woodgate: "Re: Marketing blurb - bullsh*t baffles etc"
- Previous message: Fred Bloggs: "Re: A VOTE FOR BUSH IS A VOTE *AGAINST* AMERICA"
- In reply to: Lewin A.R.W. Edwards: "Re: Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited"
- Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:55:55 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that Lewin A.R.W. Edwards
<larwe@larwe.com> wrote (in <h%L7d.2156$gs1.42@newsread2.news.atl.earthl
ink.net>) about 'Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited', on
Sun, 3 Oct 2004:
>My wife (not an electronics person) rolls her eyes when she sees the
>stacks of equipment I need. She said "Don't most people have just one
>oscilloscope?"
Believe it or not, this has been seriously discussed at one of the IEC
EMC committees. I threw in a passing remark about it, as a caution
against inadvertently introducing requirements that would lead to
creating ludicrous situations.
Most people don't have ANY oscilloscopes. The fact that I have five (and
up to three might be in operation simultaneously) doesn't create a
situation that affects the harmonic levels on the UK supply system to a
detectable extent!
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: John Woodgate: "Re: Marketing blurb - bullsh*t baffles etc"
- Previous message: Fred Bloggs: "Re: A VOTE FOR BUSH IS A VOTE *AGAINST* AMERICA"
- In reply to: Lewin A.R.W. Edwards: "Re: Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited"
- Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Recording digital data to analog tape... revisited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|