Re: 'bye for a while
From: Dave VanHorn (dvanhorn_at_cedar.net)
Date: 10/12/04
- Next message: Dave VanHorn: "Re: uPs in AoE: was Re: 'bye for a while"
- Previous message: Ken Smith: "Re: Using a uC for DC-DC conversion?"
- Maybe in reply to: John Fields: "'bye for a while"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:07:21 -0500
Atmel's Tiny-11 is $0.25 More or less the same thing, more mips, less
internal cruft.
I have code on my web page for a noise generator, and some other functions.
I agree about having some part of AofE talk about using processors in place
of conventional circuitry. I recently did a small repeater controller
(2-way radio) in a tiny-11. Very slick, only a few discretes.
There's a lot of things that I've done in the past with TTL or 4000 logic
that I would wrap up in an AVR today, and gain features, shrink the board,
and shrink the cost!
You don't have to be all that processor-specific about it either.
Pics, AVRs, 340s, Z8s, all have a clock, timers, and I/O pins, after all.
-- KC6ETE Dave's Engineering Page, www.dvanhorn.org Microcontroller Consultant, specializing in Atmel AVR
- Next message: Dave VanHorn: "Re: uPs in AoE: was Re: 'bye for a while"
- Previous message: Ken Smith: "Re: Using a uC for DC-DC conversion?"
- Maybe in reply to: John Fields: "'bye for a while"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]