Re: APD bias
From: S. hashem Aref (hashem_aref_at_ureach.com)
Date: 10/13/04
- Next message: yigiter: "Re: dc-dc converter"
- Previous message: Roy Battell: "Re: [OT] Any XP experts around?"
- In reply to: John Popelish: "Re: APD bias"
- Next in thread: John Popelish: "Re: APD bias"
- Reply: John Popelish: "Re: APD bias"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 12 Oct 2004 22:27:59 -0700
John Popelish <jpopelish@rica.net> wrote in message news:<416BF366.1E9CD867@rica.net>...
> "S. hashem Aref" wrote:
>
> > thanks,
> > When I run it with Vr=5v and illuminated it with laser diode @1550nm
> > and power=1.5mw I saw a very low voltage in output of load resistance
> > (RL=100 ohm) that voltage was about .04mv.
> > If you want to look at my circuit I can attach for you.
>
> If you have a silicon APD, it is almost completely transparent to 1550
> nm. You will need an indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs) oe germanium or
> other narrow band gap material to detect 1550.
My APD is Ge type. I used it in a simple circuit for reverse bise with
5v
becease its data*** say that Vr=5v. My be I have some mistakes in
biase circuit. I show the circuit in below.
APD
|--------<|-------|
| *
| * RL=100 ohm
| *
| C=850pf |
|------||---------|
| |
| R=100 ohm |
--****------|I----
+ -
V=5v
- Next message: yigiter: "Re: dc-dc converter"
- Previous message: Roy Battell: "Re: [OT] Any XP experts around?"
- In reply to: John Popelish: "Re: APD bias"
- Next in thread: John Popelish: "Re: APD bias"
- Reply: John Popelish: "Re: APD bias"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]