Re: OT: politically nonpolitical

From: Fred Bloggs (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 10/16/04 

Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 05:41:03 GMT

Tom Seim wrote:
> Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<416F3750.7010505@nospam.com>...
>
>>Clarence wrote:
>>
>>>"Winfield Hill" <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
>>>news:ckll0202fba@drn.newsguy.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>xray wrote...
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>>>I'd call this one close to a draw.
>>>>
>>>>That's because you couldn't see GWB's stupid smirks, "grins" and drools.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Because there weren't any. But you didn't watch the debate did you?
>>>
>>>Consensus of the media people who were in the hall was that Bush was "clearly
>>>the winner" of this debate.
>>>
>>>Not that it matters, in a poll before the first debate 90% of those polled said
>>>the debates would not change their vote. It was a show, and not a very good
>>>one!
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Just can't stop lying can you. I watched the entire debate and once
>>again Bush lost his composure- this time he actually had froth
>>developing on the right side of his mouth. Even the right wing spin
>>masters could say little more than Bush's performance has improved over
>>the first disaster- but a talking parrot meets that criterion. The
>>people who actually know what debating is about say Bush dropped out, he
>>had no intention of debating, he just wanted to get it over with. He did
>>this by evading the questions, plying supercilious humor, and retreating
>>into his campaign slogans and personal attacks against Kerry.
>>There are millions of Americans who are convinced that the issues
>>discussed, by Kerry, are of utmost importance and they want a serious
>>and considered debate; your cocaine user dropout from Texas did little
>>to help himself by trying to turn everything into a joke. Bush insulted
>>the forum of debate and he insulted the American public.
>
>
> The GRAND lie of the debates was when Kerry looked into the camera and
> said "I will NOT raise your taxes!". Pure bull***, which you, the
> bull*** artist, should instantly recognize.

Oh yeah- and let's not forget the record of the Bush administration
management of the budget. They can't get within 150-200 billion of
actual cost of *anything*. And we're supposed to rely on this crowd to
tell us how much Kerry's plans will cost?- and when they don't even
understand what those plans are? You should be more explicit about
telling people that your charges originate with the Bush campaign- they
are just more slander and deception. But since you're a deceitful fraud
, you try to make it sound like it's an official estimate of some kind-
which it isn't.