Re: OT: If Kerry is elected...

From: Jim Yanik (jyanik_at_abuse.gov.)
Date: 10/22/04 

Date: 22 Oct 2004 00:29:21 GMT

Robert Monsen <rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote in
news:lITdd.435482$Fg5.416906@attbi_s53:

> I guess I'm going to have to go through and refute these obvious lies.
> What a bore.

Nobody is refuting any charges until Kerry signs a Form 180 and releases
his records.Or when the Navy finishes it's review of Kerry's medals.

>>
>> I looked at Kerry's DD214;there are problems with it.Why did a REVIEW
>> BOARD have to OK his discharge? That is NOT common practice for an
>> HONORABLE discharge.
>> And the date of discharge does not coincide with his enlistment
>> date,it's several years later.
>>
>
> You analyzed it, eh? The military, and the entire Bush administration
> analyzed it. You came up with one answer. EVERYBODY ELSE CAME UP WITH
> ANOTHER ANSWER. Hmmm, who should I believe?

No,"everybody" did NOT come up with another answer.The DATES do nopt
coincide,and the comment about a review board for a Honorable discharge is
very unusual.
>
> If this were true, it would be on the evening news. You are blinded by
> prejudice, and obviously can't be trusted to say *anything* credible.
>
> Here is the link to JK's records again, for our esteemed readers:
>
> http://www.johnkerry.com/pdf/jkmilservice/militaryrecords_1.pdf

Only a few pages out of more than 100 pages.

>>>Why should
>>>I possibly care what your opinion is? Why should anyone?
>>>
>>
>>
>> Then why do you keep responding?
>>
>>
>
> I keep responding because I simply can't stand by and let you get away
> with repeating the same sorry lies that then have to be debunked,
> again and again. Its a page from the "Official Carl Rove Playbook".

Never read it,if it exists other than in your imagination. 

-- 
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net