Re: OT: If Kerry is elected...

From: Rich Grise (rich_at_example.net)
Date: 10/22/04 

Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 06:43:55 GMT

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:59:17 -0700, anita wrote:

> OK, I came here looking for info about capacitance calculations and I
> found this thread on full force. Since it appears that people in this
> groups are not shy of expressing their opinions I ask you two
> questions.
>
> No flames please.

I think in this thread, the threshold of what's considered a "flame"
versus what's considered "constructive criticism" may be, shall we say,
"enhanced," from other groups you might frequent. ;-)

> I ask this in all sincerity from the perspective of
> a non-American (although I live here for now- so I am as scared about
> terrorism as anyone else...) I dare not ask people I know because its
> hard for people to not assume that it is an attack and I dont want to
> be lynched!

I sincerely, seriously, thank you, literally from the bottom of my heart,
for mentioning your concerns here. I'm the group lunatic, and I claim
that I'm a messenger from the metaphysical realms, come to bring a message
of Healing for the world.

In this context, it is EXTRREMELY WONDERFUL that you have expressed these
feelings here, now.

We are going to live.

</fanatic rave>
 
> I find the doctrine of "pre-emptive strike" a very curious way to
> approach the problem of self-defense. Dont Americans think that
> someone could apply the same doctrine to THEM ?

Unfortunately, it would seen that the Americans presently in power,
and their supporters, don't "think" at all.

> Afterall USA is
> preceived by some countries, even non-"rogue" nations as a threat to
> their security...

This perception is not wrong.

> The problem is when you push people into a corner
> they are at their most dangerous...

There are many people right now, as we speak, endeavoring to bring this
very message to the ones in power. So far, it's been falling on deaf
ears. Or, maybe even worse, "divinely inspired" ears.

> With technology getting smaller
> and faster and cheaper and sneakier, maybe a terrorist can do
> substantive damage with next to nothing. What good are bombs when you
> cannot differentiate a terrorist from a regular person ? I feel its
> kind of like chemo for cancer, you kill some good cells along with a
> lot of bad cells, but how to we know the body be able to withstand it
> ?

She can't, and that's the reason that the situation is coming to a head,
in a way way beyond what anybody's imagined before.

It is the first time, _ever,_ that Spirit has made an avowed commitment
to _not_ pretend healing is complete until _all_ of the lost will is
recovered.

> My other question: About nuclear weapons- this is probably common
> knowledge but I dont really know. The US has a very strong stand about
> certain countries not making nuclear weapons. I want to know if this
> has an actual justification for this - other than just "because".

America's current rulers simply want to be king bully, and they want
to be assured that they are the only ones in the world with the power at
their fingertips to destroy everything.

They are evil, and the evil that has possessed the bodies is being
reclaimed by its creator, and the essence that's been in its grip is
being healed. While the denial energy gets worked out of the essence
that's being freed from its prison of infinite pain, there will be
some presentation of symptoms, possibly in the form of upheavals -
but as long as you stay present with your own loving acceptance for
this movement, healing will manifest.

> Eg:
> did these countries say they wont develop nuclear weapons by signing
> some treaty or something ? Because if they did not what legal grounds
> does any outside country have to dictate what another nation does ?
> Might does not make right because if used it woudl blow everyone up
> anyway, or is there a real reason other than "because we say so" ?

It's because they're victims of the imprints that were the result of
the Original Gap.

> Is this common knowledge in the us ? So what defines "rogue" nations
> other than the fact that the state department says so ?

It's all pure bull***, as you've suspected all along.

> I am neither republican nor democrat (although you can tell I am more
> of a liberal- universal health care good etc., ) and could not care
> who wins either way because all frankly there is no way Kerry or
> anyone can get us out of this mess, so it has to work itself out-
> whatever that means.

I can do it, but I'd have to be elected commander-in-chief to do it.
As commander, I'd say, "Cease fire now, and come home. International
affairs department, please let the Iraqi folks know that the soldiers
have been ordered to not fire first, althought they're still allowed
to return fire, which shouldn't be necessary, since they're going
home, and they're just boys and girls like yourselves, who'd like to
get out of this mess in one piece."

Vote for me!
You'll be glad you did!
>
> Thanks

You're Welcome!

> Anita

Rich